«

»

WSJ Ignoring Advertiser&;s IllegalBehavior?

By encinoman

Is the editorial side of the Wall Street Journal ignoring illegal behavior by LifeLock, one of the few full-page advertisers it can claim these days?  (LifeLock is best known for its CEO putting his social security number on display as a hacker&;s delight.) A judge recently ruled that LifeLock&;s fraud alert service is illegal.  But you wouldn&;t know it from the WSJ. which missed much about the financial crisis and where the often-porous &;Chinese wall&; between editorial and advertising appears to have been breached again.

Tags: Chinese-wall, LifeLock, Wall-Street-Journal

This entry was posted on May 28, 2009 at 8:01 pm and is filed under Wall-Street-Journal.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.

You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Be the first to like this post.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name * Email * Website

Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of follow-up comments via email. Subscribe by email to this site